November 14, 2025

at

5:15 pm

EST

(Updated:

)

MIN READ

Why Strategy Is Moving BTC To New Wallets

Strategy moved 43,415 BTC worth $4.26B to over 100 different addresses today. What is going on here?
Article
Guides
News
Reports
Trading

Contents

    Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) transferred 43,415 BTC worth $4.26B to over 100 different addresses today. 

    The transfers, which are visible on Strategy’s entity page on the Arkham Intel Platform, sparked panic on X as market-watchers fear Strategy has started selling its huge Bitcoin stack. Michael Saylor was forced to wade into the discussion to say “there is no truth” to the rumours. 

    It comes as Bitcoin’s price continues to slide, dipping below $95,000 today. As the sixth largest crypto-holding entity, any sign that Strategy is selling will likely lead to volatility.

    Transfers out of the Strategy entity on Arkham

    So, what is happening if, as Saylor says, “there is no truth” to the rumours of BTC being sold? 

    Our analysis points to another explanation: Strategy is performing custodian/wallet rotation. 

    Strategy on Arkham

    Over the past two weeks, the Arkham platform has shown Strategy making a series of transfers from Coinbase Custody (their existing custodian) to a new custodian. It is likely that today’s transfers are a continuation of this rotation. 

    Each transfer is likely to be one of three things: 

    • A direct transfer from Coinbase Custody to their new custodian.
    • Internal transfer within the new custodian's wallet system as they secure the assets.
    • Internal wallet refresh at Coinbase as they move assets from emptying wallets.

    On-chain movements do not mean that Strategy has sold their BTC, nor do transfers from Arkham’s Strategy entity automatically imply the sale of assets.

    Large-scale holders like Strategy regularly undergo wallet and custodian rotations for security, operational, or counterparty risk management reasons. Anyone monitoring Arkham’s Strategy entity for the past two weeks would have seen similar, smaller-scale transfers take place.

    The reaction to the movement of BTC by Strategy has been exacerbated by the general jitters in markets recently. Overblown AI valuations, hawkish Fed comments, and ETF outflows have contributed to bearish conditions. 

    Furthermore, across crypto treasury companies, mNAVs – a ratio of market cap to AUM – have been declining, indicating declining confidence in the crypto treasury vehicles. 

    For a full guide into crypto treasury companies, read our explainer here

    Crypto treasury companies explained: Strategy, BitMine, MARA and more
    Finn Grant

    Finn is a writer, formerly of The Daily Telegraph and New Scientist magazine. Prior to his career in journalism, he founded a successful blogging agency. He has been an active participant in crypto markets since 2020. In his spare time, Finn is writing a science fiction novel.

    Arkham Intelligence logo white
    Arkham
    The Arkham Research Team comprises analysts and engineers who worked at Tesla, Meta, and Apple, alongside alumni from the University of Cambridge, Imperial College London, UC Berkeley, and other institutions.
    Information provided herein is for general educational purposes only and is not intended to constitute investment or other advice on financial products. Such information is not, and should not be read as, an offer or recommendation to buy or sell or a solicitation of an offer or recommendation to buy or sell any particular digital asset or to use any particular investment strategy. Arkham makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, suitability, or validity of any information on this website and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. Digital assets, including stablecoins and NFTs, are subject to market volatility, involve a high degree of risk, can lose value, and can even become worthless; additionally, digital assets are not covered by insurance against potential losses and are not subject to FDIC or SIPC protections. Historical returns are not indicative of future returns.